Although the ethics of Kant and Scheler there is a considerable difference in form, but both are among the fundamental ethics of self-discipline. Kant's willingness to explore the moral self-discipline, and Scheler's love in order to explore the moral self-discipline. But Kant's rational self-discipline and different, Scheler stressed that personal self-discipline. For Scheler, the good moral character is the carrier of the essence of personality is an absolute time-oriented, and is in the absolute time of their behavior and the behavior (...) by continuing to build in, so the moral good must with absolute time characteristics. She Lelun both Kant and the difference between how much science, they are ultimately concerned about the moral good of the problem. (shrink)

The central theme is a hitherto unknown explanation of the “temporality” of the person as proposed by the late Max Scheler. The first part deals with the meaning of “absolute time” in general. The second part shows how the temporality of the person is to be seen as “absolute” time on the basis of two opposing principles in man: the “life-center” or impulsion, and “mind” which, without the former, remains powerless, but conjoined with it “become” personal in absolute time.

The central theme is a hitherto unknown explanation of the “temporality” of the person as proposed by the late Max Scheler. The first part deals with the meaning of “absolute time” in general. The second part shows how the temporality of the person is to be seen as “absolute” time on the basis of two opposing principles in man: the “life-center” or impulsion, and “mind” which, without the former, remains powerless, but conjoined with it “become” personal in absolute time.

Heidegger's central question, "What is the meaning of Being?", is intertwined with the concept of nothingness, as it has been since Pre-Socratic thought. I wish to articulate "nothingness" by restricting myself to three aspects of this concept given by Scheler: 1.) the meanings with which the word "nothing" is used, 2.) the moral implication belonging to the question of "nothing," and 3.) the concept of reality. It is the purpose of this selection of Schelerian thought to furnish some distinctions to (...) be made in Heidegger's central position. (shrink)